← All AI writing use cases
LinkedIn posts

An AI interview panel before the draft and a critic council after it

Tools:
Claude, Claude Code, Wispr Flow, Notion
Who it's for

Busy founders who have ideas but no time to write, and hate AI-sounding posts

What they report

No metric reported. Alex Lieberman (co-founder of Morning Brew, now at Tenex) walked through his 'Content Machine' live on How I AI: an Oracle that scans internal systems and the internet for content spikes, an interview panel that pulls out his real ideas, Markdown voice and style files, a writer's council that scores and revises drafts, and a lessons file that learns from his feedback. He argues the interview step, not the drafting step, is where slop comes from.

Example

Lieberman answers the panel's questions out loud using Wispr Flow. The draft is written from his spoken answers and his voice file, then the council scores and revises it before he sees it.

from source

How to do it

  1. Map your current content process on paper before adding any AI.
  2. Write a voice.md (how you sound) and a style.md (formatting rules).
  3. Pick a topic spike: a client win, a number from your business, a trending debate.
  4. Have Claude interview you with 5 to 7 sharp questions. Answer by voice.
  5. Draft from your answers plus the voice file.
  6. Run a critic pass with several reader personas. Revise until it clears your bar.
  7. Add every correction you make to a lessons.md file so the next draft starts smarter.

The prompt

Fill in the [brackets]
Copy prompt

Read voice.md, style.md and lessons.md before doing anything. TOPIC: [the spike, e.g. 'we lost our biggest client and rebuilt onboarding'] PHASE 1 - INTERVIEW. Ask me 6 questions, one at a time, to pull out specifics only I know: what happened, the number, the moment it turned, what I believed before, what I believe now, who this helps. Push back if an answer is vague. PHASE 2 - DRAFT. Write a LinkedIn post using only my answers. Match voice.md. No invented facts. PHASE 3 - COUNCIL. Score the draft 1-10 from each of these readers, with one line of reasoning before each score: a skeptical buyer, a peer founder, a copy editor, a scroller who reads only the first two lines. Revise once based on the weakest score. Show me the final draft and the scores. When I edit your draft, tell me what my edits reveal and propose one new line for lessons.md.

Prompt:
Legacy Builder version, based on the workflow shown in the source
Source:
Alex Lieberman on How I AI with Claire Vo (Lenny's Newsletter, Jul 20, 2026)
Read the original ↗
Legacy Builder Lab

Want help putting these to work every week?

Legacy Builder Lab is Clifton Sellers' community for founders who write their own content with AI. Members get his prompts and bot setups, five new post templates every Monday and a monthly live teardown.

Join the Lab waitlist
Run by Clifton Sellers, who also curates this library.